1981 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1981 Ford Mustang. (87 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1981 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Ford Mustang weights approximately 741 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Ford Mustang | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Ford | Westfield |
| Model | Mustang | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 2294 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 444 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2320 mm |
