1981 Ford Mustang vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Ford Mustang (173 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2012 Holden Cruze. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Because 1981 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Ford Mustang (332 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 1981 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Ford Mustang | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Mustang | Cruze |
Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 332 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2685 mm |