1981 Ford Probe vs. 1996 Marcos Mantis
To start off, 1996 Marcos Mantis is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Probe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Probe would be higher.
Because 1996 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Marcos Mantis (407 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Ford Probe. (148 Nm). This means 1996 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Ford Probe. 1981 Ford Probe has automatic transmission and 1996 Marcos Mantis has manual transmission. 1996 Marcos Mantis will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Ford Probe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Ford Probe | 1996 Marcos Mantis | |
Make | Ford | Marcos |
Model | Probe | Mantis |
Year Released | 1981 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 352 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2290 mm |