1981 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2002 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2002 Mazda Tribute is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 110 kg more than 1981 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2002 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Ford Thunderbird | 2002 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Thunderbird | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4186 cc | 2967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 195 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2610 mm |
