1981 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 170 kg more than 1981 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Ford Thunderbird | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Thunderbird | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4186 cc | 2378 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2510 mm |
