1981 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2009 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 514 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Ford Thunderbird | 2009 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Thunderbird | E-350 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 255 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 15 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3510 mm |