1981 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 2009 Smart ForTwo has manual transmission. 2009 Smart ForTwo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Ford Thunderbird | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Ford | Smart |
Model | Thunderbird | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 1870 mm |