1981 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 398 kg more than 1981 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 1981 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Ford Thunderbird | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Thunderbird | Captiva |
Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 165 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1878 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2707 mm |