1981 GAZ 24 vs. 2002 Mazda 6
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 GAZ 24. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 GAZ 24 would be higher. At 2,304 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 GAZ 24 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1981 GAZ 24.
Because 2002 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 GAZ 24. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1981 GAZ 24 has manual transmission. 1981 GAZ 24 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 GAZ 24 | 2002 Mazda 6 | |
Make | GAZ | Mazda |
Model | 24 | 6 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2304 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 164 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2680 mm |