1981 GAZ 24 vs. 2009 Mazda 2
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 GAZ 24. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 GAZ 24 would be higher. At 2,304 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 GAZ 24 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 GAZ 24 weights approximately 520 kg more than 2009 Mazda 2.
Because 1981 GAZ 24 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 GAZ 24. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 GAZ 24 | 2009 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | GAZ | Mazda |
| Model | 24 | 2 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2304 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2500 mm |
