1981 GMC Jimmy vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 GMC Jimmy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 GMC Jimmy would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 GMC Jimmy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 GMC Jimmy (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (123 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 GMC Jimmy should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 GMC Jimmy weights approximately 485 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 GMC Jimmy (285 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (161 Nm). This means 1981 GMC Jimmy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1981 GMC Jimmy | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | GMC | Toyota |
Model | Jimmy | Matrix |
Year Released | 1981 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4093 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 161 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2610 mm |