1981 Holden Commodore vs. 1952 Jaguar XK

To start off, 1981 Holden Commodore is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,142 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1981 Holden Commodore. (134 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1981 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Holden Commodore weights approximately 55 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Holden Commodore. (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Holden Commodore.

Compare all specifications:

1981 Holden Commodore 1952 Jaguar XK
Make Holden Jaguar
Model Commodore XK
Year Released 1981 1952
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4142 cc 3441 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 134 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 270 Nm 290 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1350 kg 1295 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1570 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 2600 mm