1981 Holden Commodore vs. 1952 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1981 Holden Commodore is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 4,142 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Maserati A6G (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1981 Holden Commodore. (134 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1981 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Holden Commodore weights approximately 800 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Holden Commodore has automatic transmission and 1952 Maserati A6G has manual transmission. 1952 Maserati A6G will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Holden Commodore will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Holden Commodore | 1952 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Holden | Maserati |
Model | Commodore | A6G |
Year Released | 1981 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4142 cc | 1987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 550 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2290 mm |