1981 Holden Commodore vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1981 Holden Commodore is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Holden Commodore (111 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Holden Commodore weights approximately 336 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Holden Commodore (231 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1981 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Holden Commodore | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Commodore | Cedric |
Year Released | 1981 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3298 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 231 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2540 mm |