1981 Holden Commodore vs. 1963 Seat 1500
To start off, 1981 Holden Commodore is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 4,142 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Holden Commodore (134 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Holden Commodore weights approximately 190 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Holden Commodore | 1963 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Holden | Seat |
Model | Commodore | 1500 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4142 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2660 mm |