1981 Holden Commodore vs. 1994 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 1994 Lancia Zeta is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 4,142 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Holden Commodore (134 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (89 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Because 1981 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Holden Commodore (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1981 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Holden Commodore | 1994 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | Holden | Lancia |
Model | Commodore | Zeta |
Year Released | 1981 | 1994 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4142 cc | 1929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |