1981 Holden Commodore vs. 2000 Honda FCX

To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda FCX (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1981 Holden Commodore. (111 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX should accelerate faster than 1981 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Holden Commodore weights approximately 426 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX.

Because 1981 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Holden Commodore. (231 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Holden Commodore.

Compare all specifications: