1981 Holden Commodore vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 2,837 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1981 Holden Commodore. (102 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1981 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Holden Commodore weights approximately 764 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Holden Commodore (192 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (180 Nm). This means 1981 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Holden Commodore | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
| Make | Holden | Lotus |
| Model | Commodore | Extreme |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2837 cc | 700 cc |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 192 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 456 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2420 mm |
