1981 Holden Commodore vs. 2006 Volvo V50

To start off, 2006 Volvo V50 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo V50 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1981 Holden Commodore. (111 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1981 Holden Commodore.

Because 1981 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 231 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

1981 Holden Commodore 2006 Volvo V50
Make Holden Volvo
Model Commodore V50
Year Released 1981 2006
Body Type Sedan Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3298 cc 2345 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 111 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 231 Nm 231 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 2650 mm