1981 Holden Gemini vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1981 Holden Gemini is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1981 Holden Gemini. (67 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1981 Holden Gemini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1981 Holden Gemini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Holden Gemini. (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Holden Gemini | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Holden | Triumph |
| Model | Gemini | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
