1981 Holden Gemini vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Holden Gemini is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1981 Holden Gemini. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1981 Holden Gemini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Holden Gemini weights approximately 215 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Holden Gemini (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1981 Holden Gemini will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Holden Gemini | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Holden | MCC |
| Model | Gemini | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1810 mm |
