1981 Holden Statesman vs. 2006 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Holden Statesman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Holden Statesman would be higher. At 5,041 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Holden Statesman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1981 Holden Statesman. (169 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1981 Holden Statesman.
Because 1981 Holden Statesman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Holden Statesman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Holden Statesman (361 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda CX-7. (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1981 Holden Statesman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda CX-7.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Holden Statesman | 2006 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Statesman | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5041 cc | 2298 cc |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 361 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |