1981 Honda Accord vs. 1999 Nissan R 391
To start off, 1999 Nissan R 391 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Honda Accord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Honda Accord would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan R 391 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1981 Honda Accord. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan R 391 should accelerate faster than 1981 Honda Accord.
Because 1999 Nissan R 391 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan R 391. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Honda Accord. (127 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Honda Accord | 1999 Nissan R 391 | |
| Make | Honda | Nissan |
| Model | Accord | R 391 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1602 cc | 4997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
