1981 Honda Ballade vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1981 Honda Ballade is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Triumph 2000 (89 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1981 Honda Ballade. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1981 Honda Ballade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 385 kg more than 1981 Honda Ballade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Honda Ballade. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Honda Ballade.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Honda Ballade | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Honda | Triumph |
Model | Ballade | 2000 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1334 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 108 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2700 mm |