1981 Honda Ballade vs. 1982 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1982 Matra-Simca Murena is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Honda Ballade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Honda Ballade would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Matra-Simca Murena (116 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1981 Honda Ballade. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 1981 Honda Ballade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Matra-Simca Murena weights approximately 210 kg more than 1981 Honda Ballade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Honda Ballade, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Honda Ballade | 1982 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Honda | Matra-Simca |
Model | Ballade | Murena |
Year Released | 1981 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1334 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 116 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2440 mm |