1981 Hyundai Pony vs. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Hyundai Pony. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Hyundai Pony would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 776 kg more than 1981 Hyundai Pony.
Because 1981 Hyundai Pony is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Hyundai Pony. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1981 Hyundai Pony has manual transmission. 1981 Hyundai Pony will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Hyundai Pony | 2010 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Hyundai | Chevrolet |
Model | Pony | Equinox |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1238 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1706 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2858 mm |