1981 Jaguar XJR vs. 2005 Seat Toledo
To start off, 2005 Seat Toledo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1981 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Seat Toledo weights approximately 371 kg more than 1981 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1981 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Jaguar XJR | 2005 Seat Toledo | |
| Make | Jaguar | Seat |
| Model | XJR | Toledo |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1271 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 55 L |
