1981 Jaguar XJR vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1981 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 983 kg more than 1981 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Jaguar XJR | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
| Make | Jaguar | Dodge |
| Model | XJR | CHARGER |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 288 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1883 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5077 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1482 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3052 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 72 L |
