1981 Lada 1200 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1981 Lada 1200 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1981 Lada 1200. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1981 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Lada 1200 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Lada 1200. (85 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Lada 1200.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Lada 1200 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | 1200 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1981 | 1967 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 57 L |