1981 Lada 1200 vs. 2009 Mazda 2
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 2 (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1981 Lada 1200. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1981 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 2 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1981 Lada 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Lada 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Lada 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 2 (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Lada 1200. (85 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Lada 1200.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Lada 1200 | 2009 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | 1200 | 2 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 45 L |