1981 Lada 2105 vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1981 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1981 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 792 kg more than 1981 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Lada 2105 | 2005 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Lada | Cadillac |
Model | 2105 | CTS |
Year Released | 1981 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 3175 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1002 kg | 1794 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2890 mm |