1981 Lada S vs. 2010 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Lada S would be higher. At 1,293 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Lada S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Lada S weights approximately 129 kg more than 2010 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 1981 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Lada S | 2010 Daewoo Matiz | |
Make | Lada | Daewoo |
Model | S | Matiz |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1293 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 871 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 35 L |