1981 Lancia A 112 vs. 2006 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Ford Falcon is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Lancia A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Lancia A 112 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Falcon weights approximately 830 kg more than 1981 Lancia A 112.
Because 2006 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Lancia A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1981 Lancia A 112 has manual transmission. 1981 Lancia A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Lancia A 112 | 2006 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Lancia | Ford |
Model | A 112 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Size | 903 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 655 kg | 1485 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2730 mm |