1981 Lancia Beta vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1981 Lancia Beta. (116 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1981 Lancia Beta.
Because 1981 Lancia Beta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Lancia Beta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 5 (201 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Lancia Beta. (165 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Lancia Beta | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Beta | 5 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 201 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |