1981 Lincoln Continental vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2008 Holden Commodore is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1981 Lincoln Continental. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1981 Lincoln Continental.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Lincoln Continental (313 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 1981 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Lincoln Continental | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Lincoln | Holden |
Model | Continental | Commodore |
Year Released | 1981 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 313 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |