1981 Lincoln Continental vs. 2012 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2012 Jaguar XK is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XK (550 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 421 more horse power than 1981 Lincoln Continental. (129 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1981 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 55 kg more than 2012 Jaguar XK.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XK (680 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 367 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Lincoln Continental. (313 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Lincoln Continental.

Compare all specifications:

1981 Lincoln Continental 2012 Jaguar XK
Make Lincoln Jaguar
Model Continental XK
Year Released 1981 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4942 cc 5000 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 129 HP 550 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 313 Nm 680 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1855 kg 1800 kg
Vehicle Length 5570 mm 4793 mm
Vehicle Width 1990 mm 1892 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1311 mm
Wheelbase Size 2990 mm 2751 mm