1981 Lincoln Mark VI vs. 1967 Seat 1500
To start off, 1981 Lincoln Mark VI is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Lincoln Mark VI is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Lincoln Mark VI (139 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1967 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Lincoln Mark VI should accelerate faster than 1967 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Lincoln Mark VI weights approximately 660 kg more than 1967 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Lincoln Mark VI | 1967 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Seat |
| Model | Mark VI | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5733 cc | 1479 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2660 mm |
