1981 Lincoln Mark VI vs. 1975 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1981 Lincoln Mark VI is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Lincoln Mark VI is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Lincoln Mark VI (139 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1975 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Lincoln Mark VI should accelerate faster than 1975 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Lincoln Mark VI weights approximately 575 kg more than 1975 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Lincoln Mark VI (359 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1981 Lincoln Mark VI will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Lincoln Mark VI | 1975 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Lincoln | Triumph |
Model | Mark VI | 2000 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 359 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2700 mm |