1981 Matra-Simca Murena vs. 2011 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2011 Nissan Pixo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,154 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Matra-Simca Murena (91 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1981 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Matra-Simca Murena | 2011 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Nissan |
Model | Murena | Pixo |
Year Released | 1981 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2154 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.4 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2360 mm |