1981 Matra-Simca Rancho vs. 2012 Holden Caprice

To start off, 2012 Holden Caprice is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Matra-Simca Rancho. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Matra-Simca Rancho would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 199 more horse power than 1981 Matra-Simca Rancho. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1981 Matra-Simca Rancho.

Because 2012 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Matra-Simca Rancho, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Matra-Simca Rancho. (116 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Matra-Simca Rancho. 2012 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1981 Matra-Simca Rancho has manual transmission. 1981 Matra-Simca Rancho will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: