1981 Mazda 121 vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1981 Mazda 121 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda 121. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mazda 121 | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 121 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1981 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2490 mm |