1981 Mazda 323 vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Renault Clio (171 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1981 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault Clio weights approximately 205 kg more than 1981 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 5400 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda 323. (79 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mazda 323 | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 323 | Clio |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1069 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2480 mm |