1981 Mazda 626 vs. 1947 Riley RM A
To start off, 1981 Mazda 626 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Riley RM A weights approximately 190 kg more than 1981 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mazda 626 | 1947 Riley RM A | |
Make | Mazda | Riley |
Model | 626 | RM A |
Year Released | 1981 | 1947 |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2870 mm |