1981 Mazda 626 vs. 1961 Volvo P 1800
To start off, 1981 Mazda 626 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Volvo P 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Volvo P 1800 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Volvo P 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Volvo P 1800 weights approximately 45 kg more than 1981 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mazda 626 | 1961 Volvo P 1800 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 626 | P 1800 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2460 mm |