1981 Mazda 626 vs. 2002 Honda Z
To start off, 2002 Honda Z is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mazda 626 weights approximately 85 kg more than 2002 Honda Z.
Because 2002 Honda Z is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Z will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Honda Z has automatic transmission and 1981 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1981 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Honda Z will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mazda 626 | 2002 Honda Z | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | 626 | Z |
Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2370 mm |