1981 Mazda 626 vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,310 cc, 2006 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Camry weights approximately 595 kg more than 1981 Mazda 626.
Because 1981 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mazda 626 | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 626 | Camry |
Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 3310 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2730 mm |