1981 Mazda 626 vs. 2009 Opel Astra
To start off, 2009 Opel Astra is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Opel Astra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Opel Astra weights approximately 185 kg more than 1981 Mazda 626.
Because 1981 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mazda 626 | 2009 Opel Astra | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | 626 | Astra |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2620 mm |