1981 Mazda 626 vs. 2010 Fiat Multipla
To start off, 2010 Fiat Multipla is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,908 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Fiat Multipla is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Multipla weights approximately 400 kg more than 1981 Mazda 626.
Because 1981 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Multipla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mazda 626 | 2010 Fiat Multipla | |
Make | Mazda | Fiat |
Model | 626 | Multipla |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1908 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 113 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2670 mm |