1981 Mazda 929 vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 1981 Mazda 929 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,969 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Riley RM A weights approximately 85 kg more than 1981 Mazda 929.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mazda 929 | 1952 Riley RM A | |
Make | Mazda | Riley |
Model | 929 | RM A |
Year Released | 1981 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2870 mm |