1981 Mazda 929 vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,969 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (179 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1981 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 450 kg more than 1981 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (400 Nm @ 1850 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Mazda 929 | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
| Model | 929 | BLS |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1969 cc | 1910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1850 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 90.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2680 mm |
